Michael Lindenberger, everything a journalist should be.
Michael Lindenberger’s legion of good friends and admiring
colleagues mourn his loss. At 51, he is dead too soon, felled by a mysterious
illness that his doctors couldn’t identify.
Given time, Michael would have become, I am confident, one
of America’s best-known and best-loved writers. He was that good and he worked
at it that hard. Time was all he needed, time that has been denied him – and all
the people who loved and admired him.
During the time we worked together at The Dallas Morning
News, Michael was everything I believe a good journalist should be: a compelling
writer, effective interviewer and diligent researcher.
But he was more than that. He was tough-minded but
kind-hearted, suspicious of power but tolerant of human frailty, courageous without
being foolhardy, thoughtful but no egghead, confident but not egocentric.
His untimely death cuts short a career that was beginning to
soar. Earlier this year, he was a part of a team that won the Pulitzer Prize for
a series of stories in the Houston Chronicle about “The Big Lie,” the myth of
stolen ballots, rigged elections and fake voters.
He only recently had moved to the Kansas City Star to become
the editorial page editor and vice president.
He spent 14 years as a reporter at The News, where he had
few peers. There were no holes in a Lindenberger story. It was thoroughly reported,
carefully organized and skillfully written. He was an editor’s dream.
We sat at adjacent desks, and I would get a running
commentary about the progress of his stories. Michael liked to talk things
through. I suppose it helped him organize the story before he sat down to
write. His telephone interviews, which I couldn’t help but overhear, were like
a master’s class in the art of interviewing.
He was among the first reporters at The News to use the internet
to engage his readers. He was a devoted blogger and would write long,
fact-filled posts about the news of the day, inviting his sources to participate
in an online discussion. Often, he would mine his blog for his print stories.
Such things are common today. Back then, not so much.
Aside from journalism, Michael loved to cook – and was good
at it. An invitation to one of his dinner parties promised mouth-watering cuisine,
good liquor and sensational dinner conversation, over a wide range of topics
and presided over with gusto by the host himself. On such occasions, he
reminded me a bit of Winston Churchill – all the charm and intellect without
the insults and suffocating egotism.
He showed his judgment and good taste by being a lover of
good bourbon. Kentucky bourbon, thank you very much.
A proud native of Louisville, he believed devoutly that the
best bourbon was distilled within its environs. He wouldn’t gargle with that
Tennessee mash crap.
If fate had been kinder, Michael would have had time to
finish his biography of fellow Kentuckian Robert Penn Warren, the only writer
to have won a Pulitzer Prize for both prose and poetry. His most famous work is All the King’s Men, a novel
loosely based on the career of Louisiana Gov. Huey Long.
I consider All the King’s Men as the best American novel of
the 20th century, and Michael and I had long conversations about the
book and about Warren’s creative process. I had read somewhere that Warren originally
conceived the book as a long, epic poem, but had abandoned that idea and
rewritten it as a novel, leaving much of the poetic imagery intact. The idea
captivated me, but Michael’s research gave lie to the myth. I remember his discreet
amusement at my disappointment.
Michael’s other literary hero dwelled at the other end of
the spectrum. He was an enthusiastic fan of gonzo journalist Hunter S.
Thompson, like Michael a Louisville native. Michael saw beyond Thompson’s flamboyant
personality and detected the serious writer often overlooked by critics.
The last year had been an up-and-down ride for Michael. Along
with his career accomplishments came personal tragedy when his partner of many
years, Phil Clore, died after a lengthy battle with cancer. Clore’s death rocked
Michael, who dealt with his anguish in typical fashion – by writing about it.
In a Facebook post at Thanksgiving, he wrote about living
with grief and finding a path beyond the pain.
“I’ve been a
writer all my life. And one thing I have learned is that writing is thinking.
We writers often don’t know what we think, or even what we feel, until we put
our brains through the process of spelling it out on the page.”
No comments:
Post a Comment